FEA Analysis on Rocketdyne F-1 Rocket Engine - Flanged Nozzle Bolt

Overview

Rocketdyne F-1 Rocket Engine - First Stage Rocketdyne F-1 Rocket Engine - First Stage

Rocketdyne F-1 rocket engine in action during Saturn V launch on July 16, 1969 for Apollo lunar mission.

The goal of this research is to analyze the bolted flange joint that connect the mid and lower parts of the F1 engine nozzle. The image below shows the simplified corresponding nozzle model in ANSYS (upper nozzle is excluded in this analysis). Analysis will be done using a non-linear finite element model in ANSYS to assess the margin of safety of the flange bolts and determine the gaps that develop between the jointed parts when the assembly is loaded.

Saturn F1 Engine Diagram Saturn F1 Engine Diagram

Overall Simplified ANSYS Model Overall Simplified ANSYS Model

200 Bolts Securing Middle and Lower Part of the Nozzle 200 Bolts Securing Middle and Lower Part of the Nozzle

Below are the material properties that are going to be used for this analysis.

Parts Material Young’s Modulus (psi) Poisson’s Ratio Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (per deg. F)
Nozzle 300 Series Stainless Steel 29000000 0.27 0.00001
Bolt and Nut A-286 Steel 29000000 0.31 0.0000095

The pressure due to the exhaust gas in the nozzle is calculated using 1D gas dynamics. It is assumed to vary linearly along the nozzle axis. The pressure at the exit (z=0) is 12.17 psi and the pressure at the entrance to the mid-nozzle is 47.72 psi.

The regeneration channels are omitted in the model. In exchange, a free body diagram is used to deduce the equivalent forces on the mid nozzle and lower nozzle (the upper nozzle is not modeled here). This force pair is modeled as two separate forces, each of 1000 lbf. The gas temperature is 700 F which causes thermal strain. The bolt is assumed to be pre-loaded to 50% of its breaking strength.

Essential Boundary Conditions & Governing Equations

Boundary conditions and assumptions:

  1. Frictionless support at the top surface of mid nozzle
    • Normal displacement = 0
    • Tangential traction (Shear) = 0
  2. Pressure due to propellant
    • Obey 1D gas dynamics
    • Varies in axial direction (z-axis)
  3. Force from regeneration channels
    • Pulls apart the mid and lower nozzles

Governing equations are as follows:

Differential Equations of Equilibrium Differential Equations of Equilibrium

Strain-Displacement Relations Strain-Displacement Relations

Constitutive Matrix Model Constitutive Matrix Model

Initial Calculation/Prediction

Axial Reaction of Thrust

Based on the projected area of pressure in the mid & lower part of nozzle (shaded concentric circle), we can calculate the net force in the negative z-direction. That would be the net reaction force for the whole geometry, assuming that the top mid part of the nozzle is fixed to wall/support.

The calculated projected area in the mid & lower part of nozzle is to be 9,699 \(in^2\), thus the net pressure force based on the average gas pressure at the entrance of mid nozzle and at the exit of lower nozzle is 290,970 \(lbf\).

Our model is scale to 1:400, so the net pressure force of 1/400th of the model is 727 \(lbf\).

Hoop Stress on Nozzle

We can estimate the hoop stress or the stress in the circumferential direction of the nozzle. Based on the pressure vessel theory, we can find the hoop stress is given as follow:

\[\begin{equation}\sigma_{\theta} = \frac{Pr}{t}\end{equation}\]

where \(P\) is the pressure, \(r\) is the radius, and \(t\) is the wall thickness. Plugging in all the value and we’ll get estimated hoop stress for the nozzle.

\[\begin{equation}\sigma_{\theta} = \frac{12.17 psi * 69.5 in}{0.5 in} = 1692 in\label{hoop-stress}\end{equation}\]

Thermal Strain of the Nozzle

The estimated deformation due to thermal stress can be calculated using the following thermal strain formula as shown below:

\[\begin{eqnarray}\frac{\delta l}{L} = \alpha\Delta T\\\frac{\delta l}{160 in} = (1e^{-5})(700 ℉ - 70 ℉) = 1.008 in\label{thermal_strain}\end{eqnarray}\]

Bolt Preload Deformation

The bolt is pre-loaded with 50% of it’s ultimate tensile strength which is 9280\(lb\), so the load applied is 4640\(lb\), and on each side is 2320\(lb\).

\[\begin{eqnarray}\Delta l = \frac{FL}{EA}\\\Delta l = \frac{2320lbf * 0.5 in}{(2.9*10^{7}psi)*(3.8*10^{-2}in^2)} = 0.001 in\end{eqnarray}\]

Meshing

Meshes were set up using 2 different body sizing; 0.3 inches element size for the middle and lower part of the nozzle, and 0.075 inches element size for the bolt & nuts. Statistics of the following mesh setup are as follow:

Tetrahedron Meshes Setup Tetrahedron Meshes Setup

Meshes Statistics Meshes Statistics

The number of nodes exceed the maximum number of nodes for ANSYS student, so we need to reduce the number using different meshes method; Hex dominant. Below are the meshes generated and it’s statistics:

Hex Dominant Meshes Setup Hex Dominant Meshes Setup

Meshes Statistics Meshes Statistics

Boundary Conditions Setup

Applying Thermal Strain

Thermal strain was applied to all the part of the nozzle including the bolt and nuts using time steps series as follows:

Applying Bolt Preload

Load bolt pretension was applied to the surface of the bolt thread as follows:

Applying Boundary Conditions

Frictionless support was added to the top of middle nozzle.

Applying Pressure Load

Pressure load due to expansion of hot gas due to combustion needs to be applied to surfaces that are exposed to the hot gas including the regeneration channel near to the bolt and nuts.

Pressure Load Time Step Pressure Load Time Step

Applying Load due to Regeneration Channel

Forces from the regeneration channel can be simulated by applying load in z-direction at the surface between the middle and lower part of the nozzle.

Simulated Regeneration Channel Load at Middle Nozzle Simulated Regeneration Channel Load at Middle Nozzle

Simulated Regeneration Channel Load at Lower Nozzle Simulated Regeneration Channel Load at Lower Nozzle

Contact Surfaces

Bolt to Nut Bolt to Nut

Lower to Middle Nozzle Lower to Middle Nozzle

Middle Nozzle to Bolt Middle Nozzle to Bolt

Lower Nozzle to Bolt Lower Nozzle to Bolt

Bolt Contact Bolt Contact

Finite Element Analysis Result

Force Convergence

Force Convergence Result - Solution Converged After 11th Iterations Force Convergence Result - Solution Converged After 11th Iterations

Total Deformation

Minimum deformation occured at the fixed support of the middle nozzle, and maximum deformation of 1.0992 \(in\) happened at the lower nozzle. These results are inline with our initial calculation and prediction \eqref{thermal_strain}.

Deformation Around the Bolted Nozzle Flanged Deformation Around the Bolted Nozzle Flanged

Hoop Stress

Normal Hoop Stress \(\sigma_{\theta}\) is around 1685 \(psi\) which is within ~1% range of our initial hoop stress calculation \eqref{hoop-stress}.

Equivalent Stress on Bolt

Equivalent Stress on Bolt Equivalent Stress on Bolt

Gap between Middle and Lower Nozzles

Maximum and Minimum Gap Between Middle and Lower Nozzle Maximum and Minimum Gap Between Middle and Lower Nozzle